Please wait a minute...
文章检索
汉字汉语研究  2019, Vol. 6 Issue (2): 19-25    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
汉语言文字学史研究中的汉语词义问题探索——以郑樵的假借研究为例
党怀兴
陕西师范大学文学院
 Explorations of Chinese Lexical Meanings Issues during the Research on the Chinese Graphology History—Take Zheng Qiao’s Hypothesis of Jiajie (假借) as Example
下载:  PDF(pc)(1797KB)  ( 693 )
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 
    在汉语言文字学研究史上,更多的是就文字形体问题进行研究,但也会涉及文字的意义。有些论著看似研究文字形体问题,其实主要是对词的意义问题的探索,如宋代学者郑樵在研究六书假借问题时提出的假借观,主要是对字(词)义的探索。这实际是文字学研究领域的新扩展,是值得重视的古代词义研究的新收获。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
党怀兴
关键词:      
Abstract: 
      In the history of Chinese Graphology research, most research have been focusing on issues of graphic forms, while meanings of graphs also have been involved. Some treatises seemed to study issues of graphic form, but explored lexical meanings issues actually. Such as the scholar Zheng Qiao of the Song Dynasty, he explored lexical meanings and raised the hypothesis of Jiajie ( 假借 ) when he researched the Jiajie ( 假借 ) issue of Liushu ( 六书 ), which was a new extension in the field of Chinese Graphology research actually, and a new gain of ancient word meaning research is worthy of attention.
Key words: 
               出版日期:  2019-06-20      发布日期:  2019-07-26      期的出版日期:  2019-06-20
引用本文:    
党怀兴.
汉语言文字学史研究中的汉语词义问题探索——以郑樵的假借研究为例
[J]. 汉字汉语研究, 2019, 6(2): 19-25.
链接本文:  
http://www.hzhyyj.com/CN/  或          http://www.hzhyyj.com/CN/Y2019/V6/I2/19
[1] 汪维辉. 再论“捉”的词义及相关问题——答刘钊、张传官先生[J]. 汉字汉语研究, 2019, 5(1): 11-17.
[1] ZHANG Yongquan. #br#[J]. THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2018, 1(1): 4 -11 .
[2] DENG Zhangying . [J]. THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2018, 1(1): 12 -16 .
[3] LIN Zhiqiang. [J]. THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2018, 1(1): 17 -22 .
[4] HUANG Xiquan. [J]. THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2018, 1(1): 23 -33 .
[5] LI Weiqi . [J]. THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2018, 1(1): 33 -35 .
[6] LIU Yun , YUAN Ying . [J]. THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2018, 1(1): 36 -38 .
[7] YANG Baozhong. [J]. THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2018, 1(1): 39 -48 .
[8] ZHANG Qingsong . [J]. THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2018, 1(1): 49 -55 .
[9] LIANG Xiaohong. [J]. THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2018, 1(1): 56 -67 .
[10] ZHONG Zheyu . [J]. THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2018, 1(1): 68 -74 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared