Abstract: Pan Mutian and Pan Wuyun’s article Textual Research and Analysis of Gao ( 皋 ) and Ze ( 睪、澤 )
holds that Ze ( 澤 ) is the addition of Ze ( 睪 ), and that Ze ( 睪 ) is the original form of Ze ( 澤 ), which,
however, can be proved wrong.
陈 波 先. “皋”“睪(澤)”再辨[J]. 汉字汉语研究, 2022, 19(3): 68-.
CHEN Boxian. Rethinking of the Relationship between Gao ( 皋 ) and Ze ( 睪、澤 ). THE STUDY OF CHINESE CHARACTERS AND LANGUAGE, 2022, 19(3): 68-.